Muslims can bring an end to western civilization

Muslims can bring an end to western civilization

Today there are two ongoing developments in the world which carry with them all the necessary ingredients to bring down the western civilization as we know of it.

The first of these developments is the Islamic resurgence, which, many devout Muslims believe will be the final showdown between Islam and the infidels.

They firmly believe this cataclysmic clash of civilization will result in a guaranteed victory for Islam.

With great aplomb they will refer to the Quranic verses (such as 2:30, 6:165, 7:129, 27:62) which firmly declare that only the Muslims are the rightful inheritors of earth. Allah has assured the victory of Islam by expropriating and usurping the land of the infidels and hand them over to the Muslims (verses 13:41, 21:44, 28:58).

The Islamic world is patiently waiting for this ultimate victory of Islam — no infidel should bear any doubt on this mindset of great majority of Islamic diehards.

The second development, in contrast to the above mindset of the Islamic world, is the growing apathy, ignorance, neglect and sheer carelessness of the infidels’ state of mind.

They are in the impression that the current Islamic terrorism will soon be a thing of the past, and the world will, once again, revert to the ‘world order’ which, for several centuries, they have taken for granted.

The Muslim World Resurgence

These easy going, ‘couldn’t care less’, gullible westerners still believe that Islam means peace.

Sorry, I have bad news for these apathetic western people. To gauge the extent of Islamic incursion into their civilization, please read on.

The Muslim World- Resurgence.

Muslims proudly talk about what they call “sahwa Islamia” or the “Islamic recovery” that started slowly in the late 1970s and reached an astonishing speed in the 1990s.

It first came to prominence after the declaration of jihad in Afghanistan and the success of the Islamic revolution in Iran.

This Islamic revitalization proceeded in two ideologically different fronts: with Saudi Arabia being the main driving force behind the resurgence of the Sunni Muslims; while Iran standing firmly behind the Shiite Muslims.

These two fronts are independent of each other and had frequently confronted each other. Right now, this is exactly what is happening in Iraq—one Islam slaughtering another Islam. However, the infidel world must not be deluded by such Islamic Cannibalism.

The credo that is common to both groups is their deep hatred for the west in general and America in particular.

Most Muslims consider America to be their main enemy because it is the world’s only super power and seems to stand in Islam’s way. Notwithstanding with such a unremitting hatred reserved exclusively for America, any non-Islamic country has the potential to win the main enemy title depending on the circumstances.

Islamic title

In 2008, the title was won by Denmark, thanks to the Mohammed cartoons.

Back in the 1980s the main enemy title was granted to the Soviet Union because of its support to the communist regime in Afghanistan. Islamist jihadists from all over the Islamic world poured into Afghanistan to fight the infidel/godless Soviet Union.

It is interesting to note that during those days, America was nowhere close to wining the Islamic title, as the Islamic world regarded America as an ally of the Muslims. America’s foreign policy and its support to Israel were not seen as important issues during the heat of jihad in Afghanistan.

In the 1990s, Serbia emerged as a winner of the Islamic title, because of its wars against Bosnia and Kosovo.

However, by this time the Arab opinion was changing fast against America—thanks to Al jazira Television network and its pro-Saddam agenda. Infiltrating Al jazira by the Ba’ath party was probably Saddam’s smartest and most effective anti American weapon. Saddam was well aware of the role of media as a powerful weapon in the battlefield while, even today, the Americans still struggle to comprehend this simple reality.

Muslims understand their jihad priorities very well and are aware of the need for tactical alliances that serve their purpose. Fourteen hundred years ago Mohammed had already set an example for this convenient strategy. He used to set up tactical alliances with potential enemies to keep them neutral, while he took on his adversaries—eliminating them one-by-one.

Islamic jihad exists in various forms: the military form is the best known.

But Muslims are also engaged in other softer forms of jihad on a daily basis, especially in the West: the stealth jihad.

Islamic organizations, mosques and Islamic centers are just few of the many battlefronts where Muslims work very hard to consolidate their presence in the West.

In the beginning, they only wanted basic commodities such as halal food and places for worship. While this is duly satisfied by the infidels, they now demand Islamic sharia and their own Islamic holidays, not to mention their demand to influence the foreign policies of their host countries.

There are thousands of Islamic organizations in the West whose job is to keep pushing their Islamic agenda to reshape the West. The message is loud and clear: conform to Islam or else face jihad, that is, Islamist terrorism. In other words, the host country must now become Islamic, even though the Islamic community is no more than microscopic in number.

The Western World-Apathy and Denial

The West in general has come increasingly under the influence of the liberal left which promotes a culture of self-blaming for almost every fault in this world.

The Europeans in particular have lost their sense of pride and has replaced it with a sense of guilt. They despise their history, values and the traditional family. An increasing number of women put off motherhood until late in life or even avoids it altogether, resulting in alarmingly dwindling birth rates.

Christianity lost its influence in an increasingly atheistic society, leaving a spiritual and moral vacuum that is rapidly being filled by the influx of Islam.

Incoming Muslims perceive that the western societies are in a state of moral and social decay. Young westerners become easy prey for the Muslim predators, who waste no time to do what they do best: brainwashing those westerners and converting them into willing soldiers of Islam.

Demographic damage in Europe

When he visited Europe in August 2010, the Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, told his Muslim audience in Italy that Europe would soon fall to the Muslims without a fight. The number of Muslims in Europe is already substantial and on the increase. Muslims’ high birth rate and their continued influx into the continent is bound to makes them a majority in the foreseeable future. One can rarely agree with the maverick Libyan leader on anything, but on this topic I must say I cannot agree more.

Since the defeat of Islam in the battle of Tours in 732 AD in France, Europe in particular has always been a dream to Muslims. Had the Muslims won that decisive battle, Europe would have become a Muslim land and Christianity would have vanished, rendering it as a thing of the past. But Muslims are not totally heart broken; they have reasons to believe that they can achieve with stealth jihad what their ancestors could not achieve with military jihad.

The demographic damage in Europe is already too extensive to be repaired even if the Europeans start their own sahwa now, which I don’t see happening any time soon. It appears that Europe has to come to terms with the reality that Muslims are in Europe to stay. Attempting to reverse the process now may be too late and may result in bloodshed which nobody likes to witness.

Europe, needs to make a choice between the only two options available:
•The first option is to continue the Islamization of Europe, a process which has been going on for decades.

•The second option is to force the secularization of Muslims in Europe.

The first option is what Islamists hope to achieve: to set an Islamic state in Europe which applies Shariah law and make it a model to follow by their home countries where all their attempts to establish a proper Islamic state have failed. For sometime, Muslims have been targeting Europe as a soft and tolerant continent that can only say yes to their never ending demands.

Muslims have ambitious plans for Europe; they have already started changing the identity of many European cities by planning to erect massive mosques and Islamic centers across the continent. Such mega Islamic monuments are intended to dominate the skylines of the European cities and put the existing cathedrals and churches in the shade. Islamic culture is already leaving its marks on European life as is evident from self-censorship and the limitation of free expression which was practiced by the once free European society.

The Islamization of Europe is the option chosen by Muslims and is already underway. It is not a European choice although the Europeans are not doing anything about it. (Except the brave Dutch politician Geert Wilders).

This option is unlikely to be viable for the long term because there must be a limit to the seemingly limitless European tolerance.

Shariah law is inapplicable to any country, never mind the European countries.

The fact is: Shariah law was never applied perfectly at any stage in Islamic history. Even during Caliph Omar’s time, the punishment (hudud) for theft was suspended for a year. Many Muslims do not like to hear that because it blasts the very solid Islamic principle that Allah’s rules (hudud) must never be over-ruled by a human. How do we expect to cut people’s hands in our time? And where in Europe can this kind of justice be acceptable where all thieves receive the same punishment regardless of the value and circumstances of their theft?

Islam is not only a religion; it is also a political movement which actively works to seize power to establish the Islamic state known as khilafa. Islamic Shariah is the only recognized law in an Islamic state and it forbids handing over power to other secular parties. In Islam, democracy becomes a sin and the state is ruled from the mosque just as Mohammed ruled his state from his mosque in Medina.

The second option, which is the forced secularization of Muslims in Europe, is likely to be met with fierce resistance from Muslims everywhere. It is a difficult choice that requires fundamental changes in law and some solid determination; but once applied it could be very good for Europe and the world.

There is nothing wrong with Muslims as humans, their problem lies solely in their ideology— once they are freed from it they have a chance to contribute wonders to human civilization. The behavior of European converts after they embrace Islam just proves the point — it is Islam which makes their mind sick.

Muslims’ addiction to Islam is in a way similar to addiction to drugs. Give drug addicts a choice and they will crave for more of the drugs. Muslims should not be given a choice but they should be forced to accept and respect people of other faiths and beliefs, with special regard to the Jews.

This alone should help to break a big psychological barrier. They should be forced to accept open criticism of Islam and Mohammed, which should open their minds to the sheer lie they have been living through. Mohammed’s history and the Quranic errors/contradictions should be discussed openly and without fear.

Most Muslims do not know about the shocking dark history of Mohammed and never notice the hundreds of errors in the Quran. Many ex Muslims were devout adherents of Islam until they woke up to the shocking truth about Mohammed and his Quran.

Islamic symbols, like beards and headscarves should be considered as political statements and banned, just as they are banned for that reason in some Muslim countries. Those Muslims who are not willing to conform should have it reflected in their career progress. A united stand against Islamists’ activities anywhere in the world should make Muslims think twice before going to the streets and burn churches and embassies in response to an article or cartoons. A sustained policy of forced secularization of Muslims will boost the chances of bringing up an enlightened and secularized generation of European Muslims who may become a beacon of enlightenment to other Muslims worldwide.

This is such a nice dream! But if it comes true it would be the best gift Europe will ever give to the Muslim world. The alternative to this nice dream is the nightmare of a catastrophic civil war.

The Horrible Status of Women in Islam, Part 3

In part 1 of this article, we have analyzed the facts about why our Muslim women are not free to fast for their god ‘Allah’. In part 2, we have discussed about the disgraceful status Islam has accorded to Muslim women. In this final part, I will analyze further about Muslim women’s inability to oblige to the orders of Allah and who is playing in-between them and their God?


‘Allah’, the cornerstone of the holy Kaaba, has given the privilege to Muslim men to beat their women. Allah also instructs them in the different ways they should beat them.

MEN ARE INCHARGE OF WOMEN AND CAN BEAT THEM: “Men are overseers over women, by reason of that wherewith Allah hath made one of them excel over another… And those wives whose refractoriness ye fear, exhort them, and avoid them in beds, and beat them; but if they obey you, seek not a way against them; verily Allah is ever Lofty, Grand.” (Quran 4:34)

ALLAH INSISTS WIFE BEATING: “You have rights over your wives…. God allows you to put them in separate rooms and beat them, …for they are prisoners with you having no control of their persons…” (Sirat Rasul Allah, page 651)

WIVES ARE PRISONERS – BEAT THEM: The Prophet said, “…they are like prisoners in your hands… Should they be guilty of flagrant misbehaviour, you may remove them from your beds, and beat them…” (Al-Tirmidhi Hadith, Number 104)


The Quran and hadiths document various ways of beating the women to terrorize them.

FRESH GREEN BRANCH WILL DO: “And take in your hand a green branch and beat her (wife) with It… (Quran, Sura Saad 38:44)

HORSEWHIP WILL SERVE THE PURPOSE: The prophet Muhammad said, “Hang up your scourge where your wife can see it.” [Kash-shaf (the revealer) of Al-Zamkhshari 1:525]

BEATING YOUR WOMEN IS LIKE BEATING YOUR HORSE: The Prophet Said, “A man will not be asked as to why he beat his wife.” (Sunan Abu Dawud 2142)

LOCK LEWD WOMEN UNTIL THEY DIE: Allah says, “Lewd women are to be confined to their houses until death”. (Quran, Sura An Nisaa  4:15)

MEN’S RIGHT TO BEAT THEIR WOMEN: Prophet Muhammad on his last farewell sermon advised the following to his male followers on how to deal with their women (Al-Tabari, IX:1754):

  • “….If they do, then      Allah permits you to shut them in separate rooms and to beat them.”
  • “Treat women      well, for they are [like] domestic animals with      you and do not possess anything for themselves.”

AISHA, MOTHER OF THE BELIEVERS: NO WOMEN SUFFER LIKE MUSLIM WOMEN: A woman came to Muhammad and begged her to stop her husband from beating her. Her skin was bruised so badly that she it is described as being “greener” than the green veil she was wearing. Muhammad did not admonish her husband, but instead ordered her to return to him and submit to his sexual desires. “Aisha said, ‘I have not seen any woman suffering as much as the believing (Muslim) women‘” This is Muhammad’s own wife complaining of the abuse that the women of her religions suffer relative to other women. (Sahih Al-Bukhari 7:715)


Muhammad set few meaningless norms for prayers, sometimes purely to degrade Muslim women. The following are some of those norms:


  • Narrated Sahl (bin Sa’d):      The distance between the Musalla of Allah’s Apostle and the wall was just      sufficient for a sheep to pass through. (Sahih Al-Bukhari 1:475-476,      421)
  • Narrated Ibn      ‘Abbas: Once I came riding a she-ass. Allah’s Apostle was offering      the prayer at Mina with no wall in front of him and I passed in front of      some of the row. There I dismounted and let my she-ass loose to graze      and entered the row and nobody objected to me about it. (Sahih      Al-Bukhari 1:472 & 820)
  • Narrated Nafi:      “The Prophet used to make his she-camel sit across and he      would pray facing it. (Sahih Al-Bukhari 1:485, 422)
  • Narrated      ‘Aisha: The things which annual prayer was mentioned before me      (and those were): a dog, a donkey and a woman. I said, “You      have compared us (women) to donkeys and dogs. (Sahih Al-Bukhari 1:493)

In the above hadith, our beloved prophet told his dearest wife, our dearest mother of the Ummah (Ummul-Mominoon), that she was equal to a dog and donkey. Dear Muslim sisters, please think over this: If the most illustrious mother of the believers is equal to dogs and asses, then how about ‘our father’ who slept with her? And what about their children, i.e. we Muslims? And if Aisha, the greatest Muslimah was equal dogs or donkeys, then what about you, the ordinary Muslimah.

WOMEN ARE EQUAL TO DOGS, PIGS, …: Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: Ikrimah reported on the authority of Ibn Abbas, saying: I think the Apostle of Allah said: When one of you prays without a sutrah, a dog, an ass, a pig, a Jew, a Magian, and a woman cut off his prayer. (Abu Dawood 0704)

MUSLIM WOMEN, ALL DOGS EXCEPT BLACK ONES BETTER THAN YOU: Abu Dharr reported: The Messenger of ‘Allah (may peace be upon him) said: When any one of you stands for prayer, his prayer would be cut off by (passing of an) ass, woman, and black Dog. I said: O Abu Dharr, what feature is there in a black dog which distinguish it from the red dog and the yellow dog? He said: O, son of my brother, I asked the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) as you are asking me, and he said: The black dog is a devil. (Sahih Muslim 4:1032)


Dear Muslim sisters! Muhammad’s hatred of you had no limits. He was not satisfied with the above ‘polite’ hadiths about your place in Islam. However you may see your life on earth as, the worse awaits you in the afterlife. Thanks to our merciful prophet’s boundless fondness and concern for you, he even didn’t forget about your afterlife, blessing you with the eternal fire in hell.

MUSLIMAH, YOU ARE THE DWELLERS OF HELL: The prophet said, “The denizens of Hell were commanded to get into Hell, and I stood upon the door of Fire and the majority amongst them who entered there was that of women.” (Sahih Muslim 36:6596)

MUSLIMAH, WHY YOU ARE THE COMPANIONS OF FIRE: The messenger of Allah observed: O womenfolk, I saw you in bulk amongst the dwellers of Hell. You curse too much and are ungrateful to your husbands. Your lack of common sense is judged by the fact that the evidence of two women is equal to one man. You spend some nights and days in which you do not offer prayer and in the month of Ramadan you do not observe the fast. (Sahih Muslim1:142)

The irony for you, my Muslim sisters: You didn’t fast, because our prophet barred you from fasting without the permission of your husband. And for that, you become the eternal companion fire in hell in the afterlife. Shouldn’t Muhammad or your husbands burn in hellfire for this, instead?

MUSLIM WOMEN, YOU WILL BURN IN HELL FOR HAVING NO GRATITUDE: Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas: The Prophet said: “I was shown the Hell-fire and that the majority of its dwellers were women who were ungrateful.” It was asked, “Do they disbelieve in Allah?” (or are they ungrateful to Allah?) He replied, “They are ungrateful to their husbands and are ungrateful for the favors and the good (charitable deeds) done to them. If you have always been good (benevolent) to one of them and then she sees something in you (not of her liking), she will say, ‘I have never received any good from you.” (Sahih Al-Bukhari 1:28)


Allah promised his male followers (who fight for Him to grab and handover the territories of the infidels to his Messenger) pleasure gardens with unlimited food, boundless sexual pleasures with “pearl like” boys and eternally virgin hoories, and wine and luxuries. (Quran 2:25, 55:70-74, 3:15, 4:57, 44:51-55, 52:20, 56:22, 56:35-37, 78:33). Please read the commentary of these ‘noble’ Quranic verses by famous classical Islamic scholars like Ibn-Kathir to know the ‘man-power’ your worldly husband will attain in paradise to fulfill the needs of 72 virgins, 80,000 maids, and 300 ‘pearl like’ boys. Also find out about the body-shapes of ‘round breasted’ Hoories with appetizing vaginas.

ROUND BREASTED AND FIRM, NOT SAGGING: Lo! for the duteous is achievement – Gardens enclosed and vineyards, And voluptuous (SEXY, SHAPELY) [i.e. Kawa’eb, Kawa’eb means swelling and firm, not sagging] women of equal age; And a full cup. There hear they never vain discourse, nor lying (Quran, Sura An-Nabaa 78:31-35)

1 MAN = 100 HORSE POWER: The Holy Prophet said: ‘The believer will be given such and such strength in Paradise for sexual intercourse. It was questioned: O prophet of Allah! can he do that? He said: “He will be given the strength of one hundred persons. (Mishkat al-Masabih Book IV, Chapter XLII, Paradise and Hell, Hadith Number 24)

Dear Muslim sisters! Allah and his beloved prophet have set all kinds of hurdles, degradations and deprivations to turn your earthly life hellish. You have to fight for your rights and dignity with three other co-wives and countless sex-slaves of your husband in this world. Every bit of food that you consume will be a merciful charity from your husband. Your every action, even fasting, will have to be approved by your husband. There is no end to your struggle here in this world. And you may wonder that the hardships and deprivations inflicted on you by Islam will earn you bliss in the next life. But in reality, all you get in the afterlife is the real hell, it burning fire, for eternity. Your ignominy and sufferings continues in Islam’s supposed afterlife, except with greater intensity, ferocity.

And eve for the rare blessed ones among you, who will enter Paradise, they will have to wait for your turn for sexual pleasure with their husband’s allotment of 72 ever-regenerating divine virgins (Hoories), 80,000 beautiful maids, and 300 ‘pearl like’ boys, while in this life, you could at least expect your turn once in a week. Even in Allah’s Paradise, how much more painful and ignominious your life would be is easily fathomable. You will probably find it better to burn in hell instead, which will indeed be the fate of the overwhelming majority of your fellow sisters?


Dear Muslim sisters! What is discussed in this 3-part article is not similar to what we usually hear in mosque-sermons of Imams in the name of ‘Halaqa’, ‘Dars’ or ‘Bayaan, without giving any references to their quotes. You can easily verify the authenticity of these information from sacred Islamic literature from the internet or your book-shelf. And what is covered here is only the fraction of similar denigratory references of women in the Quran and Sunnah.

You constitute a half of the Ummah. You have to realize this, particularly when you are on the losing side. This is a war that Muhammad brought upon humanity 14 centuries ago. Muhammad’s war was against the entire humanity, and we Muslims are the first and worst victims of his cult. You, Muslim women, are the worst of the worst victims of Islam. Humanity’s struggle against Muhammad’s barbaric cult cannot be won without your participation and support. I urge my Muslim sisters to study our authentic Islamic scriptures and enlighten your children about Islam’s real message, and help them be saved from being a victim of Islamic evil as you and I have been.

Part 1 here:

Part 2 here:

Islamic history will now be foisted on all British kids in school

Islamic history will now be foisted on all British kids in school

Beginning in 2014, the United Kingdom will require all British schoolchildren to complete a unit on the history of Islam, proudly reports Press TV, Iran’s very own 24-hour English language news organization.

British Education Secretary Michael Gove announced the addition of a Muslim-specific component after revisions were made to address an outcry over a prior draft that did not include any references to the monotheistic Abrahamic religion.

Muslims were among the most vocal critics. The Muslim Council of Britain, which represents about 500 Islamic institutes across Britain, declared that it was “deeply disappointed.”

The revised curriculum is “great,” though, according to Salim Mulla, chairman of the Lancashire Council of Mosques. Sulla believes that people in the country could use “a better understanding of all faiths,” notes Press TV.

“There is already a good understanding of Christianity taught in schools,” Mulla told the Iranian media outlet. “But I don’t think a lot of Christians really understand what the Muslim faith is about.”

Islam is technically the third-largest religious affiliation in the country, according to The Guardian. Christianity is the largest religious group. People claiming to have no religion is the second. Those two groups make up the vast majority of Britons.

A spokesman for the Blackburn Diocese Board of Education spoke favorably of the new draft curriculum.

“As is well known, the early Islamic civilizations gave much to the world,” the spokesman said, “and we would certainly support the teaching of such an important part of world history.”

here is a letter you can print and send to your childs school (click link)

girls praying future

The Horrible Status of Women in Islam, Part 2

Dear Muslim sisters! In Part 1 of this article, we have come across many ‘golden sayings’ of our noble prophet about Muslim women. Those sayings make it crystal clear that your status in Islam is not only lower than men, but also as low as or even lower than domestic animals. The troublesome issue of women in Islam is endless. We can’t cover it all in a few short articles. So, I will keep this discussion brief touching only a few points and complete it in three parts, leaving an earnest request to my Muslim sisters to spend some of your time to study Islamic scriptures on your own in order to know your real status in Islam.


Muhammad’s imaginary brainchild Allah the most Gracious has allowed Muslim men to marry up to four wives. If they desire for the pleasure of new flesh even after having four wives, they can just dismiss one by uttering ‘talaq’ three times and bring in a new one. In addition, Muslim men can have slave-girls as many as they want to spice up their sex life.

UP TO 4 WIVES:  “… then marry such women as seem good to you, two and three and four; but if you fear that you will not do justice (between them), then (marry) only one or what your right hands possess…”  (Quran, Sura An-Nisaa 4:3)

The ‘right hand possession’ in the above verse simply means slave women.

Four wives not enough for me — you get four, I get more: Muhammad

Our holy prophet had four wives and a number of slave-girls to have sex with completing the quota as per the verse 4:3. But he was not satisfied with the lot of wives and wanted more. So, Allah later revealed a new verse (Quran 33:50), giving him special permission to have as many wives as he wanted. This verse gave him another special permission to have sex with any Muslimah he desired for. Most of us Muslims are unaware that prophet Muhammad had 15 official young beautiful wives (most of them had been made widow by Muhammad as he lusted toward them), neither do we know about the number of sex-slaves and countless sex-partners from among the Muslim women, who freely “offered” themselves to him. (Quran Al-Ahza’b 33:50; Sahih Al-Bukhari 6:311, 7:760). (I strongly recommend to my Muslim brothers and sisters to search and read these quotes. You will get more and more, if you go on search by yourself)

MUHAMMAD USED TO KEEP WOMEN AS HIS POSSESSION: The Muslims said among themselves, ‘Will Safiyah be one of the Prophet’s wives or just a lady captive and one of his possessions?’ (Sahih Al-Bukhari 5:524)

ELEVEN WIVES AT THE SAME TIME: Narrated Qatada: Anas bin Malik said, “The Prophet used to visit all his wives in a round, during the day and night and they were eleven in numbers.” I asked Anas, “Had the Prophet the strength for it?” Anas replied, “We used to say that the Prophet was given the strength of thirty (men).” And Sa’id said on the authority of Qatada that Anas had told him about nine wives only (not eleven). (Sahih Al-Bukhari 1:268, 7:142)

ONLY ONE WIFE FOR HIS SON-IN-LAW ALI: Muhammad bribed his momin soldiers with four wives and unlimited number of concubines, which was not sufficient for himself, and he ordered Allah to reveal a special new verse allowing only him to break this limit. He never bothered about the feelings of his existing wives as he went on adding more and more women into his harem.

Yet, Muhammad had some soft corner for feeling of women when the woman in question was his own flesh and blood. So, when Ali, husband of his daughter Fatima, wanted to marry a second wife, Muhammad opposed it:

Narrated Al-Miswar bin Makhrama: I heard Allah’s Apostle who was on the pulpit, saying, “Banu Hisham bin Al-Mughira have requested me to allow them to marry their daughter to Ali bin Abu Talib, but I don’t give permission, and will not give permission unless ‘Ali bin Abi Talib divorces my daughter in order to marry their daughter, because Fatima is a part of my body, and I hate what she hates to see, and what hurts her, hurts me.” (Sahih Al-Bukhari 7:157, 201)

One should not take this as Muhammad’s courteous feeling toward women in general. All he cared is for himself and his extended family, and designed and used Islam to achieve that selfish end to the maximum. So, we see that he clearly understood the hurt Fatima would suffer if Ali had taken more wives. Here he had an opportunity to abrogate the earlier verse 4:3 that allowed his followers to take up to four wives. Instead, the holy prophet increased his own quota, allowing him to take unlimited number of wives and sex-partners. Muhammad obviously was a heartless opportunist and did not care for anyone except himself and his own flesh and blood. So, while he kept adding wives one after another into his harem, he prevented Ali from taking a second wife, when he wished to marry another woman. Thus, Muhammad prevented Ali from acting within the law of Islam. Nonetheless, Ali, a perfect student of Muhammad, proved himself almost as good as his father-in-law by taking 9 more wives alongside Fathima, but only after the death of Muhammad. He also produced 28 children, where the beloved prophet of Allah failed to match his protégé. Maasha Allah!


The following hadiths reduce Muslim women to the level of domestic animals as a Muslim man is allowed to gift his wife to other Muslim man.

HUSBAND = ALLAH: Reported by Abu Dawood, Ahmad, Tirmizi, Ibn Magah and Ibn Haban. Had I ordered anybody to prostrate before any one, I would have ordered women to prostrate before their husbands on account of men’s rights over the women ordained by Allah. (Mishkat al-Masabih, Section ‘Duties of husband and wife’, Hadith No. 70)

SEX FIRST & FEEDING THE CHILDREN LATER: The prophet of Allah said: When a man calls his wife to satisfy his desire, let her come to him though she is occupied at the oven. (Mishkat al-Masabih Book I, Section ‘Duties of husband and wife’, Hadith No. 61)

WIVES CAN BE GIFTED TO BROTHER MUSLIM AS COMODITIES: A man may say to his brother (in Islam), ‘Have a look at either of my wives (and if you wish), I will divorce her for you. (Sahih Bukhari 7:10)

BE OBLIGED 24 HOURS TO YOUR HUSBAND IF YOU WANT PARADISE: Whosoever female dies while her husband is pleased with her, will enter Paradise. (Mishkat al-Masabih Book I, Section ‘Duties of husband and wife’, Hadith No. ii, 60)


All Muslims should read the following very interesting hadiths that can be downloaded from the internet. I have excerpted these elaborated hadiths due to the shortage of space.

1) UMAR; THE MAN BEHIND IMPOSITION OF BURQA OR NIQAAB: Two men were instrumental in the imposition of veil on Muslim women. The first one was Umar, who originated the hijaab, purely for his lust toward slave-girls. The second person was our prophet Muhammad, who approved it with Allah’s sanction, for his lust towards his newly married Zainab, his ex-daughter-in-law.

Umar, a very close companion and the second “RIGHTLY GUIDED” caliph as well as the father-in-law of Muhammad, was a lustful person. He used to harass the slave-girls during night hours, when they went out of the house for answering nature’s call. On a few occasions, he mistakenly harassed the free women in the darkness, thinking that they were slave-girls, and they complained to Muhammad. As Umar wanted to keep harassing the slave-girls, he asked the prophet to ‘reveal’ a verse for imposing hija’b on the free Muslim women, but not on the slave-girls. And new revelation came down sanctioning the wearing of hija’b by free women on Umar’s demand. (see Sahih Al Bukhari 1:148, 8:257, 6:10, 6:313, 6:318)

I urge my dear sisters to refer all these hadiths, that I fetched it for you, from different sources.

Hijaab only for free women, not the slave-girls: We Muslims generally think that Islam imposed hijaab for protecting the women in general. Absolutely, not! In fact, its first sanction was meant for the protection of only a small percentage of the women, namely the four official wives of Muslim men. The vast number of women, the slave-girls, the captive girls and kuffar women, were not supposed to cover themselves with the Hijaab. And this was also to protect the Muslim women from the lustful Muslim rascals. The slave women were not allowed to cover their body, except a piece of skin sheet under their waist. Here a story of Umar’s beating of a slave-women who wanted to protect herself from the harassment of Muslim by wearing burqa:

Al-Musaiab bin Darum said: ‘I saw Umar holding a stick in his hand and striking a slave-girl’s head until her scarf came off, he then said: ‘Why does the slave assume the manners of free woman?’ (Tabaqat ibn Saad, 7:127; Kanz al-Umal, Vol. 15, p. 486, Hadith 41928; Tarikh Damisha, 58:191)

2) BURQA OR NIQAAB; THE RESULT OF IMPATIENT ‘YOUNG’ BRIDEGROOM MUHAMMAD: The verse regarding the veil or niqaab was the outcome of the frustration of the new bridegroom, our 58-year-old prophet, who was impatient to meet her new wife cum ex-daughter-in-law Zainab. (Sahih al-Bukhari 7:375 & 8:225; Quran Al-Ahzab 33:53)

(These hadiths are long. Please find them from the internet using the hadith numbers or from your hadit books. I assure you that you will quickly recognize how impatient our newly-wed 58-year-old ‘young’ bridegroom Muhammad was to meet his beautiful bride Zainab, also his daughter-in-law.)


We Muslims are often told about the sacrifices and piety of the ‘Sahaaba’– companions of Prophet Muhammad — and that we cannot attain even 1/100th of their piety, however hard we try. There are hundreds of hadiths that shows how ‘pious’ the Sahaaba were, some of which I have discussed in my previous articles. The following few hadiths will also reveal the exceptionally high level of piety of some of our prophet’s close companions. I like to reiterate here that there are still lots of stuffs in Arabic that need to be translated into other languages. Those are the real hadiths that mirror the life of Muhammad and his Sahaba. What we are reading today are either soft or watered-down version of their lives.

  1. Nafe’e narrated that whenever Ibn Umar wanted to buy a slave-girl, he would ‘inspect’ her by analyzing her legs and placing his hands between her breasts and on her buttocks” (Sunnan Al-Kubra, Vol. 5, p. 329 by Imaam Beyhaqi)
  2. ‘Mujahid reported that ibn Umar placed his hand between (a slave-girl’s) breasts and shook them’ (Musnaf Abdur Razak, Vol. 7, p. 286, Tradition 13204)
  3. Naf’e reported that when Ibn Umar wanted to buy a slave-girl he would place his hand on her buttocks, between her thighs, and may uncover her legs’ (Musanaf Ibn Abi Shayba, Vol. 4, p. 289, Tradition 20241)
  4. Mujahid said: ‘I was walking with ibn Umar in a slave market, then we saw some slave dealers gathered around one slave-girl and they were ‘checking’ her, when they saw Ibn Umar, they stopped and said: ‘Ibn Umar has arrived’. Then ibn Umar came closer to the slave-girl, he touched ‘some’ parts of her body and then said: ‘Who is the master of this slave-girl, she is just a commodity!’ (Musanaf ibn Abi Shayba, Vol. 4, p. 289, Tradition 20240)


Dear Muslim sisters! I often see some of you walking on the road so proudly in your Burqa or Hijaab like a princess of Arabia, which makes me rather uncomfortable, for I know the dirty secrets behind the imposition of Hijaab on women in Islam. Those of you reading this article, after knowing the same secrets, would also find it laughable, indeed embarrassing that you are being forced to wear the burqa for the unholy character of the holy prophet and his Sahaaba. It is a gravely unfortunate for our Muslim sisters that over the past 1400 years, they have been carrying the burden and curse of the lustful character of the holy Prophet and his virtuous companions.

I urge you again to study Islam, and make your children to aware of what our real Islam is, and help unshackle them from the cursed shackle of Islam. It is also the responsibility of my Muslim brothers, who really respect human values, to understand our beloved religion and free yourself along with your family members.

The discussion will continue in next part of this article.

part 1 here:

part 3 here:

The Liberal Bigot

The Liberal Bigot

Like all organisms the liberal bigot is an evolved creature, although the character traits which made him – hypocrisy, the wish to create the world in his own image, paternalism, a sense of moral superiority, a desire to gratuitously interfere with the lives of others, false humility, self-indulgent masochism and a pathological refusal to accept evidence which contradicts emotionally based beliefs – are as old as civilised man. Those who know their history will readily recognise the basic personality of the liberal bigot, for it is that of the Puritan.

Very primitive types existed in the ancient world – Plato’s Socrates has much of the liberal bigot’s smugness and ability to ignore the facts of human nature – but it was not until the eighteenth century that creatures displaying most of the modern liberal bigot’s general features emerged in the shape of men such as William Wilberforce and Jeremy Bentham.

But Wilberforce and Bentham still had some moral sense and it is Shelley who perhaps first displays the peculiar humbugging amorality of the modern liberal bigot with his continual prating about his love for ‘mankind’, whilst behaving abominably to all and sundry.

The nineteen thirties saw the first indubitably modern liberal bigot – described by Friedrich Hayek after he found one called Harold Laski at the London Schoool of Economics. To be sure Laski did not have certain of the detailed traits associated with the liberal bigot of our time – for example the hatred of academic success in the working class – nor did he possess the instinct to dissemble his paternalism. But he had that quintessential quality of the fully developed liberal bigot, an intellectualised pseudo-morality or, to put it more exactly, ethical rules without moral context.

Since the discovery of Laski, liberal bigots have become increasingly common and they are now a very widely spread pest. They are particularly fond of habitats such as politics, the arts, universities, the media and the social services. They can be found in all Western societies, but nowhere do the creatures have such success as in the Anglo-Saxon world, where they have captured political control of their societies.

The liberal bigot’s ideological and psychological starting point is the fantasy, which he maintains in the face of all the evidence, that man is a generally malleable creature who can be changed by social engineering to create a world fit for liberal bigots; although in so thinking the liberal bigot misunderstands his own psychology for he would find such a place supremely uncongenial. No more would he be able to posture in the public eye because there would be no matters occasioning expressions of liberal bigot moral outrage or excuses for paternalistic action. Even more alarmingly, in a realised liberal bigot society, he might be forced to match his behaviour to his words. However, he may rest easy in his bed for such a world is but fit for dreams.

The liberal bigot has but one general principle, but what a principle it is, being so all-embracing that no other is needed. He holds as an article of faith that no discrimination should be made between human beings, regardless of man’s natural inclinations and Nature’s distinction by sex, sexual inclination, race, colour, culture, class, talent, intelligence, education, personality, physical condition and age – unless, of course, the person judged is female, homosexual, non-Caucasian, poor, stupid, uneducated, old or crippled. Then the liberal bigot may discriminate to his heart’s content, although in the weasel-worded manner of Lenin’s ‘democratic centralism’ he calls it ‘positive discrimination’ and thinks it not in the least ‘judgemental’. This he has institutionalised in a totalitarian system called political correctness.

Above all things the liberal bigot delights in what he calls ‘racism’, which in practice means the white man defending his own interests or extolling his own culture. This the liberal bigot has raised to the status of the great modern blasphemy. Just as once the Holy Office caused men to be burned for denying the literal truth of transubstantiation, so just as surely does the liberal bigot wish to immolate those who distinguish amongst their fellows on the most natural grounds of all, a sense of kinship, of shared culture and experience. So central is this tenet to modern liberal bigotry that the liberal bigot has moved in the past forty years from believing that racial discrimination is bad to asserting that multiracial societies are a positive good.

The fact that such societies always experience considerable friction between their various racial components is not, of course, taken as evidence by the liberal bigot that he is wrong, but as ammunition for promoting more restrictions on the white population and further reason for indulging in positive orgies of European cultural denigration.

At some level the liberal bigot realises that his creed is at odds with reality. So, following in the footsteps of religious intellectuals such as Aquinas and political theorists such as Marx, he creates an elaborate fictional world which is baldly represented as ‘natural’ or ‘right’, and reality ‘unnatural’ and ‘wrong’, even though intellectually he would deny any objective morality or measure of cultural worth.

Like all those who adopt intellectually indefensible ideologies, the liberal bigot makes disbelief a heresy and punishes it with a gamut of sanctions which range from simple expressions of distaste through exclusion from public life to the passing of laws threatening fines and imprisonment for those who express the ‘wrong’ opinions.

Morality exercises a peculiar difficulty for the liberal bigot for he is caught between believing in moral relativism and a desire to impose his own standards on the world, for which he cannot, necessarily, have any absolute sanction. This dilemma is partially solved by the development of an amoral personality and by using doublethink to hide the intellectual contradiction.

The liberal bigot decries ‘nationalism’ but he is also a firm advocate of cultural expression, provided, of course, that the people concerned are within his approved ideological circle of deserving causes. That a sense of cultural worth and identity is practically indistinguishable from nationalism the liberal bigot cannot accept, so he represents the two as opposites. When pressed with disloyalty, he often makes a spurious distinction between patriotism and nationalism and says he is ‘proud’ of such things as Britain’s history of providing sanctuary for refugees, which trait, when translated to the nature and level of modern population movements, is of course of the greatest possible disadvantage to the receiving country. If he is in the media he will crudely mock the idea of national feeling by being absurdly jingoistic in trivial matters as in the statement: “The space shuttle took off today. The plastic wrappers for the food were British.” His hysterical laughter at any suggestion that Churchill or Wellington might be worthy of respect changes to a childlike reverence when his thoughts turn to such vicious charlatans as Che Guevara.

The liberal bigot wishes to enjoy the material wealth, physical security and intellectual tolerance of the advanced civilisation in which he lives, whilst decrying all the institutions and habits which have produced this happy state. He publicly laments such things as poverty, but he reacts most strongly to suggestions that his personal wealth should be expended on those causes supposedly dear to his heart – it is to the public purse that the liberal bigot looks, first, second and last. He extols the virtues of ‘working class’ or ‘ethnic’ customs and values, but takes good care to avoid contact with unreconstructed members of such groups by living well away from or cocooning himself within a gentrified part of their areas.

In truth, the liberal bigot has little knowledge of the groups whom he purports to champion. Loving humanity in the mass, he finds their individual reality at odds with his ideology and personal inclinations. Even worse, he cannot but suspect that the downtrodden prole or black does not take him seriously, that in some curious way he is patronised by the very people he imagines desperately need his help. Now if there is one thing which enrages the liberal bigot above all others, it is not being taken seriously. While uttering a great deal of cant about how much he is against snobbery, how he is just a common man no different from anyone else in the street, he is mortally offended when he is taken at his word.

The liberal bigot decries privilege but excepts it eagerly when the beneficiary is himself or other liberal bigots. How cleverly he creates jobs and status for those of a like mind. He is always pushing for more, and better paid, social workers, teachers and race relations operatives, whom he constantly refers to as ‘professionals’. Indeed, on the question of formal status he can be decidedly touchy. For one who supposedly embraces egalitarianism this is rather strange, but then not so odd when his propensity for hypocrisy is considered, for there is nothing he likes so much as having his cake and eating it.

The liberal bigot is the enemy of social opportunity for all but his likeminded fellows. The happy recipient of social and educational opportunities which permit him to enter the magic circle of liberal bigotry, his voice is always to be heard berating the value of such things for what he calls ‘the underprivileged’. To this end he speaks of the worth of ‘working class’ and ‘ethnic’ cultures which, of course, cannot be preserved if ‘middle class’ values are foisted upon their members. And this is scarcely to be wondered at, for the liberal bigot is essentially undemocratic. A politically sophisticated and educated working class capable of effectively challenging liberal bigot ideas is the last thing the liberal bigot wants. Besides, without them who would he have to patronise so superbly?

The self-conscious masochism of the liberal bigot knows no bounds. Like the medieval Christian who cried “I am the humblest of men”, he commits the sin of pride in a peculiarly distasteful manner as he seeks approbation under the guise of self-denigration. How diligently he vies with others to prove that his society is the guiltiest of colonial and cultural oppression; how relentlessly he denigrates his own people’s cultural and intellectual achievements.

What will be the future of the liberal bigot? Like the nautilus with its ever increasing spiral, the liberal bigot continues to evolve regardless of specific advantage. He acknowledges no sense of belonging or cultural indebtedness, whilst exhibiting a truly unthinking arrogance in his belief that no matter what he does or what cause he supports, his own person will be inviolate, both intellectually and materially.

In fact, the liberal bigot exhibits the classic behaviour of the parasite. He enjoys benefits gained at the expense of the host, in this case Anglo-Saxon society. But parasites can only be successful in the long run if they do not so weaken the host that it is eventually unable to support them.

Consequently, the liberal bigot is unlikely to survive in his present form for very long because he shows no capacity for controlling his voracious appetite for incontinent abuse of his environment.

WINNING DEBATES FOR DUMMIES: A Guide for Muslims to win and debate with ten easy tricks

1. Always keep your CAPS Lock on. This way your post will be difficult to read and no one will be able to answer.

2. Whenever someone comes up with a verse from Quran that make you unable to defend, say that it is out of CONTEXT.

3. Whenever someone comes up with a Hadith that makes you unable to answer, say… that Hadiths are not reliable.

4. When someone comes up with both Quran and Hadith, say that Quran and Hadiths could be understood in Arabic only.

5. When someone comes up with Quran and Hadith and also proves that he/she understands Arabic, say that these verses are for a time period only and could not be applied today.

6. When you cannot answer any questions, say that Islam is fastest growing religion and soon it will be proven to whole world.

7. When someone comes up with proofs that Islam is not fastest growing religion, say that these figures are biased and by Christians.

8. Paste some videos about Scientific Miracles of Quran from YouTube. When someone proves that these videos are stupid, shout that they are biased.

9. Keep on pasting random verses from Quran irrelevant of topic to divert attention.

10. Finally when you are totally on the run, curse and threat people with Hell fire and say that they are not worthy of Islam.

These are also in the comments there.

11. Throw platitudes such as “Islam is a religion of peace”, “Men and woman have equal rights in Islam”, “There is no compulsion in Islam”. Good thing you don’t have to provide any evidence for these statements.

12. Use conjecture and guesswork to prove your case. Good thing again, that you don’t have to provide any references to the Hadiths or respected Islamic commentaries!

13. Attack Christianity! You can pick any random point that you can remember. It need not be related to the issue at hand and there is no need to know anything about the matter. Just pick up an argument that you found online on some Muslim websites.

14. Jump to another topic.

15. Claim victory even if you are badly beaten in the argument!

16. If nothing works revert to personal attacks. Call people bigots and islamophobes! Throw insults such as “female dog in heat”. Swearing is allowed. And don’t forget to blame the Jew!!!

17. Even if that doesn’t help issue anonymous threats. If you don’t want to bother with any of the above tricks make this your first and single option.

18. Claim that Christianity has the same fallacies… (which at best proves that both are wrong and not prove that Islam is right)

19. Jump topics… they always remind me of a jackrabbit.

20. Like a dishonest skeptic, ask question after question after question… paying no attention to the answers provided… u miss a single one and they go “Hey, told u… Islam is right”.

21…. Quote as many random quranic verses as you can in one breadth to confuse the opponent (even if the verses have nothing to do with the topic at hand. I have seen Dr. Zakir Naik quote verses left and right though they have nothing to do with the topic he is discussing.)

22…Quote the Bible to prove Mohammad is a true prophet (even though the verses have nothing to do with Mohammad).

23…. Find any word in the Bible that rhyms with Mohammad and use that verse to prove that Mohammad is a true prophet. (Regardless of the fact the verse is talking about something else).

24…. Keep saying that the Bible is corrupt (with out any logic or reason) to prove Mohammad is right.

25…. Audience should interupt the Oponent debator by shouting Alah Oh Akbar repeatedly to try to confuse him.

26…. If nothing else works, start burning churches all over the world and start killing christians to prove Mohammad is a true prophet and Islam is a religion of peace.


Mine is,, “My Islam apologetic site debunks you”.


“My Allah is greater than your Allah.”

Muslim Women Cannot Fast on Their Own – Why? Part 1


This title would have shocked both Muslims and the ‘infidels’ as well. It is true and recorded in Islamic sources. This article is in two parts, and I have dedicated it to all women of our planet earth in general and to my Muslim sisters in particular.

Dear Muslim Sisters! Allah (Muhammad) specifi…cally says to all Muslims that the observance of fasting by all Muslims is entirely for Him and He will give rewards directly without other’s interventions (!) (Sahih Al-Bukhari 3:128).


You may be surprised to why our Allah likes to deal with us only in the matter of fasting, then what about the other deeds? Don’t ask questions like, “If fasting is for Allah, then other things like prayer, Zakat etc., are for whom?” You are not allowed to ask questions in our Islam. Quran, Sura Al-Maaida 5:101

So we Muslim got the only opportunity to deal with Allah is the deed of our fasting. It is another surprise, you Muslim women are not free to take decision whether to fast or not. It is recorded in our Islamic scriptures at many occasions. Our prophet Muhammad denied you to fast, unless with the permission of your husband, though Allah says that fasting is a deal between Him and the devoted Muslim, and He will give rewards directly to the fasting Muslims.

“Abu Huraira narrated that the Messenger of God said, ‘No woman can fast a day of Ramadan, while her husband is there, without his prior permission.'” (Al-Tirmidi, Sawm 65)

(Sunaan of Abu Dawud, hadith No: 2458-59) (Sahih Muslim 5:2238) (Intentionally, I’m not writing the content of these hadiths, because, I want my sisters to search for it from the internet by its numbers that I have given, and with that you will find number of hadiths of this kind for your stomach. At least, by this way, you will know what your Islam says about you?)

You might think that why our all-knowing prophet interfering between you and your Allah, if the deal is direct between you and Allah? Also it is obvious that our prophet is behaving very impartially with Muslim women by saying this.


On the other hand, our Muslim apologists are boasting that no other religion gives special privileges to women as Islam does and they gives quotes on quotes from Quran and hadiths without giving its exact reference numbers as part of their doctrine of deception (Al-Taqiya). I thought, it is unfair to keep our Muslim sisters in dark. So in most of my articles, I have tried to bring out few hadiths out of numerous, from the authentic sources with its reference numbers for your easy search. After reading it, you my sisters, will surely admit that you have the ‘special’ privileges over all women on this earth (!)

Finally, you will have to admit that the claims of our Muslim apologists on this issue of liberating Muslim women are correct (!)  Muhammad; ‘the champion of women’s rights’ had taken care of every small need of you believing women in these following hadiths (!)


The problem with our modern Muslims, be male or female, is the ignorance of the actual message of Islam. It is as simple as this: Muhammadan males are the soldiers of Muhammad to establish Muhammad’s rule to this entire world, costing their lives, and the females are the mere ‘entertainers’, servants and  producers of Muslim soldiers. Absolutely not more than that!

Dear Muslim sisters! Don’t ever think that you have any respectable place in Islamic cult. If Muhammad had, even a small percentage of respect for you, he would have not interfered in between you and your Allah. But this was not the case. Muhammad considered you as non-human species, and also he knows very well about ‘Allah’; his own created imaginary character.

Dear Muslim sisters! I seek apology for bringing to your attention, the dirty quotes on you in this article, from our Islamic sources. I’m just exposing the facts from our own Islamic scriptures that we generally ignore to study. Without informing it to you, I can’t just burry this information after I read by myself from our ‘Holy’ books. My intention of sharing this information by writing this article is only to instruct you and not to insult you. Dear Muslim sisters! Hold your breath, as you are about to know your place in Islam.


Hence, this article is dealing the issue of women’s’ fasting, let us go in deep waters to explore on this issue. Our prophet; the champion of women’s rights, had taken every care on Muslim women’s rights.

YOU ARE FREE TO GO TO TOILETS (!): The Prophet said to his wives, “You are allowed to go out to answer the call of nature.” (Sahih Al-Bukhari 1:149)

GENEROUSITY OF MD OVER YOUMUSLIM WOMEN: The Prophet said, “If someone divorces his wife just in his mind (!), such an unuttered divorce has no effect. (Sahih Al-Bukhari 7:194) (Thank ‘god’ you are safe).

MUHAMMAD; THE SIMBOL OF MORALITY: (Don’t get shocked! But, this is the teaching of our Noble Prophet, who did everything with Allah’s permission.)

The prophet said, “If a woman decides to make a grown man unlawful to marry her, she should suckle him. After that she can remove her hijab and expose her hair to him.” (after exposing her bosoms to him(!). Do you think I’m exaggerating? Please refer:- Sahih Muslim 3426,3428). (This is what Muhammad and his Sahaaba wants from you)

YOU SHOULD NOT MOURN FOR ANYBODY, LEST IT WILL DEMINISH THE DESIRES OF YOUR HORNY MAN: The Prophet said, “It is not l awful for a Muslim woman who believes in Allah and the Last Day to mourn for more than three days, except for her husband, for whom she should mourn for four months and ten days.” (Sahih Al-bukhari 7:252) (You are not free to mourn even for your beloved one)

CURSE BE ON THOSE NATIONS WHICH YOU RULE: “Never will succeed such a nation as makes a woman their ruler.” (Sahih Al-Bukhari/ Vol 9:219) (Muhammad’s absolute intention is to confine you with in the four walls of your house)

TRAVELLING ALONE EVEN FOR 1 DAY IS PROHIBITED FOR YOU: Allah’s Apostle said: It is not lawful for a woman who believes in Allah and the hereafter to undertake a day’s journey except in the company of a male relative. (Sahih Muslim 7:3105) (This is to show how incapable you are in Islam. Thank ‘god’ the women astronauts Kalpana Chawla and Sunitha Williams are not Muslims. It is very pitiable situation that we don’t know how many Muslim women astronauts and scientists are dying at their ‘grave-like’ Muslim houses).

WOMEN CAN BE MORTGAUGED: (Sahih Al-Bukhari 5:369) (It is a vast hadith; Please read it directly from the source, as it is a long hadith).


Dear Muslim sisters! Don’t try to fight for equal rights in Islam. Our ‘Sultan’ Muhammad has set norms between you and the Muslim males, with the approval of his ‘black piece of rock’ Allah.

“…and men are a degree above them. Allah is Mighty, Wise”. (Quran, Sura Al-Baqra 2:228)

1 MAN = 2 WOMEN: “Allah directs you in regard of your Children’s (inheritance): to the male, a portion equal to that of two females…” (Quran/ Sura Al-Nisa/ 4:11)

2 SHEEP FOR MALE & 1 SHEEP FOR FEMALE: Narrated Umm Kurz: I heard the Prophet (may peace be upon him) say: Two sheep are to be sacrificed for a boy and one for a girl, but it does you no harm whether they (sheep) are male or female. (Abu Dawood 15:2829)


The following are the ‘evil jokes’ on you, uttered by our ‘man of self esteem’. Each hadith is self- explanatory. No comments are required.

Narrated Usama bin Zaid: The Prophet said, “After me I have not left any affliction more harmful to men than women.” (Sahih Al-Bukhari 7:33)

I have not seen anyone more deficient in intelligence and religion than you. O women, some of you can lead a cautious wise man astray.” (Sahih Al-Bukhari 2:541)

The Prophet said, “Evil omen is in 3 things. It is in a woman, a house and in a Horse.” (Sahih Al-Bukhari 7:30-32)

Whoever had uttered the above verdict on you, either Muhammad or his ‘puppet’ Allah, he is a scoundrel.


Muslim sisters!  After reading the above hadiths on you as one of Muslim family member, nothing has left to discuss on the issue of ‘family values in Islam’. Your ‘position’ at your father’s house and your husband’s house would have puzzled you and reminded you constantly that you are inferior among your male family members. That is not all. The reason why you are so inferior will be understood to you by reading the following ‘Golden words’ of our prophet. My dear sisters, again I reiterate that my intention is not to hurt you, but to reveal to you, your actual status in Islam. You are not only inferior to Muslim males of your family, but also equal to domestic animals, and sometimes even lower than animals.

WIVES AND CHILDREN ARE ENEMIES: Allah says to Muslim men, “Your wives and children are enemies to you. So, beware of them.” (Quran, At Taga’bun 64:14)

DON’T TRUST YOUR WIVES: “Tell the men with you who have wives: never trust a woman.” (Ishaq, p. 584)

After reading the above two hadith, what will be the opinion of your ‘pious’ husband on you and your children. That is why many ‘pious’ Fidaayeen Muslims blast themselves, to meet their ‘Hoories’, without caring for their family. They are not similar to our ignorant moderate Muslim men, who are in vast majority. The ‘Fidaayeen’ knows their religion very well.


I seek apology for writing these following ‘Golden words’ of our prophet from our Islamic scriptures.

MARRYING A WOMAN = BUYING A CAMEL: Narrated Abdullah ibn Amr ibn al-‘As: The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: If one of you marries a woman or buys a slave, he should say: “O Allah, I ask Thee for the good in her, and in the disposition Thou hast given her; I take refuge in Thee from the evil in her, and in the disposition Thou hast given her.” When he buys a camel, he should say the same kind of thing. (Abu Dawud 11:2155)  (After reading this hadith you are free to call our good-for-nothing prophet, as whatever you wish to name).

YOUR FATE WILL BE DECIDED BY YOUR MALE INCHARGE: The Messenger of Allah said: “Any woman whose marriage is not arranged by her guardian, her marriage is invalid, her marriage is invalid, her marriage is invalid. (Ibn Majah 3:9:1879) (Poor creatures! This is what you get on outstanding obligingly character)

O MEN! GET YOUR ‘JOB’ DONE WITH CROOKED RIB: Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “The woman is like a rib; if you try to straighten her, she will break. So if you want to ‘get benefit’ from her, do so while she still has some crookedness.” (Sahih Al-Bukhari/ Vol 7:113) (As I mentioned earlier Muhammad wanted his female followers to fulfill the sexual desires of his male soldiers. And that’s it)

WOMEN ARE LESS THAN DIRT: Women have a very special place in Islam. They are worse than dirt.  Allah says, “Believers, ….If you are ill, or on a journey, or come from answering the call of nature, or you have touched a woman, and you find no water, then take for yourselves clean dirt, and rub your faces and hands.”  (Quran, Sura Al Nisa’ 4:43) (To clean your ‘touch’, Muslim men need ‘dirt’)

WOMAN AS A WHOLE IS A PRIVATE PART: Ali reported the Prophet saying: ‘Women have ten (‘awrat – Ten private parts). When she gets married, the husband covers one, and when she dies the grave covers the ten. (Kanz-el-‘Ummal, Vol. 22, Hadith No. 858) (Already you are the living-dead)


Muhammad interfered even in the very delicate matter of feeding. After monetarily weakened you by confining you at homes, Muhammad made you, totally depend on your husband for all your small needs.

FEEDING YOUR WIFE IS A SADQA: Narrated Sad: The Prophet said, “Whatever you spend will be considered a Sadaqa for you, even the mouthful of food you put in the mouth of your wife.” (Sahih Al-Bukhari/ Vol 7:263,266 & 572)

YOU EAT FIRST AND GIVE THE LEFTOUT TO YOUR WIFE: O Messenger of Allah! What right has the wife of one among us got over him?’ He said: ‘It is that you shall give her food when you have taken your food, that you shall clothe her when you have clothed yourself. (Sunan Ibn Majah, Kitab al-Nikah, Hadith No. 1850.)

(The above two hadith degrades you to the level of beggars).


YOU ARE TILTH FOR MUSLIM MEN TO CULTIVATE MUSLIM FIGHTERS: Your wives are as a tilth unto you; so approach your tilth when or how ye will (Quran, Sura Baqara, 2:223) (You are merely a land to cultivate Muslim population)

Narrated Mu’awiyah ibn Haydah: I said: Apostle of Allah, how should we approach our wives and how should we leave them? He replied: Approach your tilth when or how you will, give her (your wife) food when you take food, clothe when you clothe yourself. (Abu Dawood 11:2138)

REASON FOR ‘HALAALA’ AFTER DIVORCED BY YOUR HUSBAND: (Sahih Al-Bukhari 7:715) Please read this long hadith from the concern source from internet, by typing the hadith number.

PROPHET’S FILTHY LANGUAGE ABOUT WOMEN: The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: ‘She will get the dower, for you made her vagina lawful for you.’ (Sunan Abu Dawood 11:2126) (You cannot expect this kind of filthy talk, even from a worst kind of rascal on the street. You will find more such filthy language of our prophet, once you start exploring the Islamic scriptures)


There are no boundary for him, when Muhammad has decided to degrade you. He did not spare even the infants among you.

BABY BOY’S URINE: Narrated Um Qais bint Mihsin: I brought my young son, who had not started eating (ordinary food) to Allah’s Apostle who took him and made him sit in his lap. The child urinated on the garment of the Prophet, so he asked for water and poured it over the soiled (area) and did not wash it. (Sahih Al-Bukhari 1:222-223)

BABY BOY’S URINE vs BABY GIRL’S URINE: Narrated / Authority Of: Lubabah bint al-Harith “Husain bin Ali urinated in the lap of the Prophet (saw), and I said: ‘O Messenger of Allah (saw), give me your garment and put on another garment.’ He said: ‘Water should be sprinkled on the urine of a baby boy, and the urine of a baby girl should be washed away.’” (Sahih) (Sunan Ibn Majha, hadith no: 522)

Narrated / Authority Of: Ali that the Prophet (saw) said concerning the urine of a nursing infant: “Water should be sprinkled over the urine of a boy, and the urine of a girl should be washed.” …when the two types of water (urine) are the same. He said, “That is because the urine of the boy is of water and clay, but the urine of the girl is of flesh and blood.” Then he said to me: “Did you understand?” I said: “No.” He said: “When Allah the Most High created Adam, He created Eve (Hawwa) from his short rib, so the boy’s urine is from water and clay, and the girl’s urine is from flesh and blood.” Then he said to me: “Did you understand?” I said: “Yes.” He said: “May Allah cause you benefit from this.” (Hasan) (Sunan Ibn Majha, hadith no: 525)

Today on internet, some Muslim apologists (rascals) are defending the above hadiths by saying that baby girl’s urine is more infectious than baby boy’s.  That is not all. Read the following saying of our prophet.

DOG’S URINE IS SUPERIOR THAN BABY GIRL’S: Narrated Abu Huraira: …..narrated Hamza bin ‘Abdullah: My father said. “During the lifetime of Allah’s Apostle, the dogs used to urinate, and pass through the mosques (come and go), nevertheless they never used to sprinkle water on it (urine of the dog.)” (Sahih Al-Bukhari 1:174)

CONCLUSION: Dear Muslim sisters! Don’t get dejected by the above quotes. What I have brought to you is a drop from the dirty ocean of Islam. I plead you to study the Islamic scriptures, at least from now onwards and save your’s, as well as your children’s future.

part 2 here: